Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 07:07:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 69582 times)
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« on: June 07, 2016, 08:19:02 PM »

Hillary with narrow leads in Bernalillo county (which she lost by 3 in '08) and in Santa Fe County (which she lost by 17 in '08).
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2016, 08:29:34 PM »

Sanders seems to be doing better than Obama in Eastern SD, so you'd think that when Western SD comes in, the margin will narrow, and SD will be quite close.  I don't think Bernie will totally catch her, but we'll see.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2016, 09:08:00 PM »

If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.

Does it though?  She only won NM by 1 point in '08.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2016, 09:54:22 PM »

It's early in MT, but so far Clinton is significantly outperforming her 2008 margins in Gallatin and Ravalli Counties.  At the very least, if Bernie wins it should be much closer than Obama's 2008 win.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2016, 10:45:47 PM »

Looking at counties that have a significant amount of precincts reporting in CA, not just early vote, Hillary is doing very well as compared to her '08 margins.  I don't she how she loses, and it's very likely it'll be much more than the 2 point margin we saw in 37 polls (although that's not totally fair, as declaring Clinton the nominee yesterday could very well have affected things).
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2016, 11:23:48 PM »
« Edited: June 07, 2016, 11:26:29 PM by john cage bubblegum »

Looks like we got a dump of precincts in Missoula.  Only a 60-37 margin is not what Sanders was hoping for there.  This thing could be very close, and Clinton is very much in play.  I was expecting a very close race in SD with a Clinton tilt; but I was not expecting this result in Montana.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2016, 12:29:52 AM »

With 1/3 of the vote out in Missoula, you'd think the networks would be able to call Montana.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.