Should Badger be sporting a Red avatar instead of Blue? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 05:58:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Should Badger be sporting a Red avatar instead of Blue? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Yes (sane)
 
#2
No (batsh**t insane)
 
#3
I don't use avatars (Grumps normal)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 49

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Should Badger be sporting a Red avatar instead of Blue?  (Read 1042 times)
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,557
United States


« on: October 06, 2017, 06:30:43 PM »
« edited: October 06, 2017, 06:35:02 PM by Malcolm X »

Yes, you shouldn't identify with a party that you share absolutely zero beliefs with.

Good thing this doesn't describe Badger!

Name some then, I mean this is a guy who opposes right to work low wages laws, supports a remotely livable 15 dollar minimum wage and criticises austerity politics "let them eat cake" dystopian Randism, so you can't argue the whole fiscally conservative and socially liberal greedy hack who only votes Republican b/c all s/he cares about is reducing their personal tax rate shtick.

he also opposes deregulation corporate welfare, tax cuts wasteful deficit spending, and believes that its fascist for corporations to stop employees from protesting on company time supports the basic freedom of speech protections we are entitled to under the first amendment.




FTFY
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,557
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2017, 06:38:58 PM »
« Edited: October 06, 2017, 06:43:22 PM by Malcolm X »

Yes, you shouldn't identify with a party that you share absolutely zero beliefs with.

Good thing this doesn't describe Badger!

Name some then, I mean this is a guy who opposes right to work low wages laws, supports a remotely livable 15 dollar minimum wage and criticises austerity politics "let them eat cake" dystopian Randism, so you can't argue the whole fiscally conservative and socially liberal shtick.

he also opposes deregulation corporate welfare, tax cuts wasteful deficit spending, and believes that its fascist for corporations to stop employees from protesting on company time supports the basic freedom of speech protections we are entitled to under the first amendment.




FTFY


Deregulation and cutting taxes for small businesses = More Jobs

And its also the company right to fire you for your actions during Work Hours


15 dollar min wage= Higher Prices and Less Jobs

Opposing Right To Work= Only benefits union leaders

Opposing cutting spending = More deficits







Deregulation and cutting taxes for small businesses = Wasteful deficit spending

And its also not the company right to fire you for taking a knee during the national anthem at a football game to protest police brutality and show support for freedom of speech


15 dollar min wage= Better quality of life and greater demand for goods and services

Opposing Right To Work= Benefits workers

Opposing cutting spending = More tax cuts for the wealthy

See, I can ignore what you're saying and mindlessly post buzzword-esque slogans using poor grammar too Smiley

Edit: Not sure how I missed this gem:

You cant be an economic liberal and be a Republican.



Ronald Reagan wasn't a Republican?  Huh.  The more you know Tongue
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,557
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2017, 06:44:48 PM »

Yes, you shouldn't identify with a party that you share absolutely zero beliefs with.

Good thing this doesn't describe Badger!

Name some then, I mean this is a guy who opposes right to work low wages laws, supports a remotely livable 15 dollar minimum wage and criticises austerity politics "let them eat cake" dystopian Randism, so you can't argue the whole fiscally conservative and socially liberal shtick.

he also opposes deregulation corporate welfare, tax cuts wasteful deficit spending, and believes that its fascist for corporations to stop employees from protesting on company time supports the basic freedom of speech protections we are entitled to under the first amendment.




FTFY


Deregulation and cutting taxes for small businesses = More Jobs

And its also the company right to fire you for your actions during Work Hours


15 dollar min wage= Higher Prices and Less Jobs

Opposing Right To Work= Only benefits union leaders

Opposing cutting spending = More deficits







Deregulation and cutting taxes for small businesses = Wasteful deficit spending

And its also not the company's right to fire you for taking a knee during the national anthem at a football game to protest police brutality and show support for freedom of speech


15 dollar min wage= Better quality of life and greater demand for goods and services

Opposing Right To Work= Benefits workers

Opposing cutting spending = More tax cuts for the wealthy

See, I can ignore what you're saying and mindlessly post buzzword-esque slogans too Smiley


Lets agree to this


If someone agrees with you more on these above issues they are a Democrat and not a Republican .

Let's agree on this: By your definition, Ronald Reagan was not a Republican since – as you so helpfully pointed out – you can't support economic liberalism while being a Republican.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,557
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2017, 07:50:27 PM »

Reagan was not an economic liberal( by the american definition anyway).



Reagan cut taxes

Reagan supported Deregulation

Reagan wasnt in favor of very pro union policies

Reagan wasnt in favor of doubling the min wage







Economic liberalism does not mean liberal on economic issues by the American definition of the word "liberal" Roll Eyes  And even if it did, who fought and died to make you dictator of who can and can't be a Republican?
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,557
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2017, 10:10:02 PM »

Reagan was not an economic liberal( by the american definition anyway).



Reagan cut taxes

Reagan supported Deregulation

Reagan wasnt in favor of very pro union policies

Reagan wasnt in favor of doubling the min wage







Economic liberalism does not mean liberal on economic issues by the American definition of the word "liberal" Roll Eyes  And even if it did, who fought and died to make you dictator of who can and can't be a Republican?

Alright ask him who he would have supported for president since 1980 , and if his answer is mostly democrats he is a democrat .

I mean, he wants Kasich to run in 2020 and IIRC voted straight-ticket Republican in 2014, so...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.