HOUSE BILL: Penal Reform Act 2018 (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:19:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HOUSE BILL: Penal Reform Act 2018 (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HOUSE BILL: Penal Reform Act 2018 (Passed)  (Read 5440 times)
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« on: January 13, 2018, 06:52:57 PM »

Alright, here are my gripes with this bill,

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I would like to request a definition of torture in terms of this bill

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I am personally opposed to this section because prisoners in solitary confinement are put there for a reason. A lot of them could be highly dangerous to fellow prisoners and we do not need an increase of prison violence. Thus I propose removing this section.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Like my other colleagues have mentioned, how are we going to pay for this process?
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2018, 06:55:17 PM »

I'm skeptical about this bill in its present form. I agree with my colleague Rep. ReaganClinton's concerns on the prohibitions on solitary confinement. And there's also this -

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What does this entail?

Individuals will be able to go by their preferred pronouns and where what they want.

I don't have any particular objection to letting prisoners insist on being referred to as 'her' I guess, but does this mean they'd then be automatically eligible for transfer to the institution for the opposite gender? That's a far bigger issue and one that needs discussion. With rigorous psychological and medical evaluations, maybe, but I'm deeply skeptical of adopting the modern woke stance of "you are what you identify as" when it comes to the incarcerated.

And... wear what they want? This is a prison!
Prison uniforms should be streamlined no matter what gender the inmate is. There is no changing that.
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2018, 05:02:52 PM »
« Edited: January 18, 2018, 06:09:32 PM by Representative ReaganClinton »

Personally, I believe that Rep. Oakvale's amendment is a bit extreme, but I do approve of Rep. AZ's amendment. So a Nay to Oakvale's proposition, and an Aye to AZ’s.
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2018, 08:59:58 PM »

Nay
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2018, 09:10:45 AM »

Abstain
Logged
RC
ReaganClinton20XX
Atlas Politician
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 2,276
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -6.09

P P P

« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2018, 04:49:30 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.