Would a less bland VP pick have helped either candidate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 06:48:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would a less bland VP pick have helped either candidate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would a less bland VP pick have helped either candidate?  (Read 5548 times)
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,706
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
« on: October 15, 2018, 03:04:18 PM »

Trump benefited from the picking of mild-mannered, old guard Pence; it helped to bring social conservatives and more traditional Republicans out to vote for him and provided a good contrast to Trump's erratic behavior. In Clinton's case though, I think she would have definitely benefited from a more enthusiastic VP pick like Elizabeth Warren or someone of that grain. Hillary already had a problem of coming off as inauthentic, robotic, and cold. Picking someone with similar traits as her VP was a terrible decision.

This. Pence was objectively a very good VP pick. Kaine wasn't.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.