Smallest county to go for Kerry? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 10:10:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Smallest county to go for Kerry? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Smallest county to go for Kerry?  (Read 10103 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« on: July 27, 2007, 09:46:54 AM »

Right now, I'm thinking its Issaquena, MS. Census Bureau says they have less than 2000 people. They also say they've lost 20% of their population since 2000!
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2007, 09:49:05 AM »

San Juan, CO has a population of just 578. That one's going to be hard to beat.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2007, 10:02:08 AM »

Kennedy County - TX.

Kerry won with 85 votes, to Bush's 82.

Yeah, that must be it. Just 402 people in the whole county. Really makes you wonder how a local government can function with so few people.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2007, 05:39:32 PM »
« Edited: July 27, 2007, 05:49:49 PM by memphis »

The county in TN with the fewest votes cast (VanBuran) also went for Kerry. It's also 99.2% white.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2007, 11:29:10 PM »

Kennedy County - TX.

Kerry won with 85 votes, to Bush's 82.

Yeah, that must be it. Just 402 people in the whole county. Really makes you wonder how a local government can function with so few people.

Consider all the incorporated rural towns and villages that have 400 or fewer persons. Most of them have local governments that are working fine. In comparison with Kennedy Co, I would expect that the only substantial difference is the extent of the small-population county compared to a town.

I'm sure they know what they're doing, but it's hard to see how a local gov't could run a school, and road maintenance, and a health department, and a police force, and a driver's license center and a million other things when there are only a few hundred people altogether.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2007, 10:07:06 PM »

I'm sure they know what they're doing, but it's hard to see how a local gov't could run a school, and road maintenance, and a health department, and a police force, and a driver's license center and a million other things when there are only a few hundred people altogether.

Driver's licenses are usually handled at the State level, not local.  Also in South Carolina at least, road maintenance is largely a State not a local responsibility.  For example, the residential cul-de-sac I live in is officially a State secondary road, so there's no need for local government to handle roads.

Even if the state is writing the checks, you still need people on the ground to do the work. Although I'll take your word for it, it seems really odd to me that the state of South Carolina takes care of your street. I guess if it works for your state, that's cool.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.