How could 2020 be (at least somewhat realistically) crazier than 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 08:48:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  How could 2020 be (at least somewhat realistically) crazier than 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How could 2020 be (at least somewhat realistically) crazier than 2016?  (Read 1812 times)
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,882
Spain


« on: November 20, 2018, 01:36:23 PM »

The simplest idea is to simply have third parties actually win states. Bonus for multiple third parties

Here's a possible map with a centrist democrat winning a landslide while a far left candidate wins several states and a McMullin like candidate also wins states and the Libertarians also winning states:



Centre-left Democrat: 379 (39%)
Donald Trump: 127 (31%)
Libertarian candidate: 15 (14%)
McMullin-like candidate: 10 (7%)
Far left candidate: 7 (9%)

Then again such an sceario has essencially a 0% chance of happening, and even a single third party winning a state is extremely unlikely, that's just the craziest idea I could come up with while extrapolating from 2016
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.