The Big Questions of the Week...Including: Will Palin Become The Next Eagleton? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 07:54:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  The Big Questions of the Week...Including: Will Palin Become The Next Eagleton? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Big Questions of the Week...Including: Will Palin Become The Next Eagleton?  (Read 1951 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« on: September 02, 2008, 02:47:55 AM »
« edited: September 02, 2008, 02:57:28 AM by Politico »

It is now being reported that McCain's personal top choices were Lieberman and Ridge, who were vetoed by his political team due to their pro-choice stances:

"'They didn’t seriously consider her until four or five days from the time she was picked, before she was asked, maybe the Thursday or Friday before,' said a Republican close to the campaign. 'This was really kind of rushed at the end, because John didn’t get what he wanted. He wanted to do Joe or Ridge.'"

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26501863/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE TOP QUESTIONS OF THE WEEK

Why did McCain allow his political team to veto his preference and essentially pick somebody who was not his first, or even second, choice?

Who is really calling the shots in McCain's campaign (i.e., who told him to pick Palin without a thorough vetting)?

Why is McCain sending a new vetting team to Alaska? 

Is Palin really going to put a political campaign before her family's needs?

What other skeletons are in the Palin closet?

How could McCain, given all of his experience and supposedly good judgment, so royally screw up his first major decision as his party's presidential candidate?

If McCain becomes president, will he be like Bush and take risky gambles like this at the instruction of his political team without clearly thinking things through first?

Is McCain going to ask for Palin's resignation today or tomorrow so he can have somebody else formally accept the nomination for VP on Wednesday night? Or will he say, like McGovern said of Eagleton before forcing his resignation, that he backs Palin "1000%"?

Will pro-choice, Al Gore-running mate Joe Lieberman (Who is on the side of Obama and mainstream Democrats, not McCain, on every issue not involving the Middle East, his hobby horse) be tabbed to replace Palin? Or will it be pro-choice, northeastern Tom Ridge? Or will McCain allow his political team to veto his preference once again, culminating in the selection of Pawlenty, Huckabee or Romney?
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2008, 03:27:33 AM »
« Edited: September 02, 2008, 03:36:17 AM by Politico »

Logical Question #1:  Do you think that Biden was Obama's first, or possibly even second choice?  I think it's pretty obvious that Obama wanted Kaine.

There are no news reports, or anonymous quotes, indicating that Kaine, or anybody other than Biden, was Obama's first choice. There are, however, reports that McCain wanted Ridge or Lieberman, but was vetoed by his political team for whatever reason. Why did McCain allow his political team to pull his strings as if he were a puppet? I thought McCain was not like Bush in that he was his own man who called his own shots...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

They obviously made the decision without properly vetting her. What does that say about their decision-making skills? This was the most important decision to be made during this campaign, and they screwed it up...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If they simply trusted the word of an ambitious politician, instead of getting to the source, then they all deserve to be fired. Reports now indicate that not a single person in Alaska was asked about Palin by his vetting team. It does appear they may have blindly believed the word of this ambitious politician during the entire process...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes, and her ambition is hurting the ticket and the Republicans' chances in November. Your family ought to come before your political ambitions.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

At this time, we have no idea if there are any sexual imbroglios of any sort in her past, or if there are other accusations of abuse of power as mayor and governor. The Republicans better hope there will not be more revelations in the week or two before Election Day - otherwise, they will lose big. What a risk!
 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The Troopergate Incident indicates that she may not be pretty clean after all. Where there is smoke, there may be fire....Do Republicans really want to risk hearing the fine details of this incident in the days leading up to the Election?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Maybe there's another DUI story that was covered-up ala Bush circa 2000?

These stories are not going to go just go away with the hurricane, either...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

She's seriously hurting the ticket less than a week into the campaign. Her inexperience (There are THOUSANDS of mayors of towns of 9000 people or less) takes away McCain's tactic of going after Obama on experience. The fact that there are far better qualified candidates out there is rubbing people the wrong way; it looks like McCain is simply pandering to women, hoping they will vote for him simply because his running mate is a good-looking woman. That is quite insulting to many women, as anybody who has talked to regular voting women this past weekend can attest to.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What are the many advantages of a Palin pick? She's a woman, so women are instantly more likely to vote for the ticket? Nonsense.

If there are advantages to this pick, do they clearly outweigh all of the negatives that have started to trickle out, with potentially more to come? And do any advantages make up for the simple fact that there are clearly MANY other candidates, including many women, who are far more qualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency? Let's not forget that McCain is 72 and has had three or four bouts with cancer (it's been so many times I've lost count)...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

McCain's first and second choices were reportedly Lieberman and Ridge. Why would McCain allow his political team to veto his preference once again after this debacle?
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2008, 04:15:29 AM »

This thread, including the responses from both sides, is proof that Palin has at least violated the number one rule of every running mate: Do no harm to your ticket
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2008, 04:35:42 AM »
« Edited: September 02, 2008, 04:40:18 AM by Politico »

It's a circus of scandal after scandal, essentially turning her into the George Allen of 2008. I would be shocked if this is not damaging the ticket in any way. I would heavily bet these scandals are hurting the ticket's polling numbers, which will be reflected in polls taken today and tomorrow if she survives politically to give an acceptance speech Wednesday night.

We shall see. If the McCain vetting team in Alaska finds anything else over the next 36 hours that is even close to being on par with Troopergate, I presume that McCain will demand her resignation before Wednesday's speech so that he can get Palin to introduce Romney or Pawlenty as the running mate instead...even though McCain's first and second choice would still be Lieberman and Ridge Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.