If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:45:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century?
#1
Yes--- Top 3 or 4
 
#2
Yes--- Top 5 or 6
 
#3
Maybe---- but gets bumped off the top of the charts
 
#4
No--- Decent Pres but issues with social and economic policies
 
#5
No--- One of the worst Ever
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: If it wasn't for 'Nam would LBJ be one the best Presidents in the 20th Century?  (Read 4254 times)
vanguard96
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 754
United States


« on: June 14, 2017, 02:16:54 PM »

So--- LBJ actually got a ton of s**t done on American Domestic politics.

He expanded Medicare and Medicaid, developed an entire policy position based upon "The War on Poverty" that included everywhere from his humble roots in Central Texas, to rural Appalachia, as well as poor communities of color in the cities and rural areas throughout America.

LBJ not only expanded the legacy of the New Deal to many communities abandoned by the progress of the New Deal, but as a poor White Boy from Texas, was actually able to get a ton of stuff done that JFK didn't do, and might well have not done, even if he had not met with an untimely demise at the hand's of a domestic terrorist in Dallas Texas on that fateful date in '63.

I honestly believe that if it weren't for Vietnam, LBJ would likely be viewed as one of the best American Presidents of the 20th Century.

Thoughts???

If one views the War on Poverty a success or at least a noble mission and also considers the New Deal as a great thing then naturally one would love LBJ, racist warts and all. I do not and view LBJ as the third worst president of the 20th Century behind only Wilson and FDR in terms of the damage done toward encroaching the power of the state.
Logged
vanguard96
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 754
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2017, 09:12:30 PM »

[quote }
Isn't that like saying "If it wasn't for the Depression, Herbert Hoover would be the best Republican President in the last century?"
[/quote]

Although he was very activist from 1930 on, Hoover is considered 'laissez-faire'. This is more a smear on classical liberal values than Hoover in my opinion.

This association of Hoover with 'doing nothing' and 'laissez-faire' did considerable damage to the reputation of the free market.






Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.