HB 1191: Party Organisation Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:03:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  HB 1191: Party Organisation Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: HB 1191: Party Organisation Act  (Read 1888 times)
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« on: February 11, 2018, 08:11:06 PM »

While the primary idea sounds like an interesting concept, some parties do not have enough support in all three regions to sustain a primary. Also, having delegates elected is a more complicated process and less engaging for party membership as opposed to the current process, where all members are delegates. In addition, I believe that it is best for the parties to have the freedom to choose when they want to hold their primaries (some may not want to hold them at the same time).

Finally, I believe, as a party leader, that it is best for the party itself to decide how to run their own conventions and the voting process, as the leader is best in tune to the system that the party is best suited for. For example, point 7:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The leader is the best person to decide who should participate in the party's primary, not the regions.
Logged
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2018, 12:45:24 PM »

By this definition, Labor is one member away from losing major party status.

one-party state
Logged
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2018, 11:08:14 PM »

Why strip away party affiliation appearing on ballot for someone in a member party? I think they should have the right to run under the party's name of their registration.

Strange coming from someone claiming political parties had no control who could be on a ballot using their name, and now you want to stop a citizen from appearing with his registered party.

Tiny parties are not a problem. I don't see the need to try to make them invisible or more difficult to exist.

If you want to make rules for parties, male rules for big ones. Why not forbid them to run primaries to choose one canddiate for a race, that way every party member could have the right to run in any election with the party's name. It could produce races with more candidates and offer more choices to citizens.     

I'm going to agree with Poirot here. Having individual parties is what makes Atlasia interesting, and if this passes, parties like the Liberal Democrats would effectively, in terms of elections, cease to exist.
Logged
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2018, 12:07:12 PM »

Not sure if this is protocol since this amendment hasn't been adopted yet, but here's an amendment to the amendment:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2018, 03:38:49 PM »

Aye.
Logged
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« Reply #5 on: March 13, 2018, 10:02:41 AM »

If there are no more concerns (which there seem to be none), I call for a final vote.
Logged
wxtransit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,105


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 2.43

« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2018, 08:26:39 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.