Why does the future always have to be liberal? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:59:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Why does the future always have to be liberal? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why does the future always have to be liberal?  (Read 8378 times)
Karpatsky
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545
Ukraine


« on: February 23, 2018, 08:31:18 AM »

It’s pretty simple. Young people tend to be liberal, and old people tend to be conservative. Pundits predict the old conservatives will die out and the young liberals will overtake the voting landscape. Said young liberals get older (wiser?) and become more conservative. The young liberals of the previous generation become old conservatives, and their children become the young liberals. Rinse and repeat.


Reagan did better among younger voters than older voters




Yeah, the 'old conservative, young liberal' is not a real thing; rather, it is a specific consequence of a single generational shift: the Western (largely American) Baby Boomers, who were more conservative than either those who preceded them and followed them.

Re: the main question, the future isn't necessarily 'liberal', but it will not be 'conservative'. The world changes, this is inevitable, and if you define any societal change at all as 'liberal', then you will find yourself a frustrated 'conservative'. In many ways, modern society is more conservative than it was in the past, especially in the United States; there was a time when the majority of American workers were unionized.
Logged
Karpatsky
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2018, 08:51:11 AM »

OP is right, at least in the West the future is fascist. I'm more worried about the global south though, wonder how many bombs an increasingly bleak West means for them
Conservatism is simply a fallback position when liberal measures prove ineffective or counterproductive. Right-wing dynamism typically has a reactionary bent, a desire to bring back old ways of social organization that accept modern technology and modern means of propaganda.

Fascism is Bolshevik terror and techniques of propaganda in the service of a reactionary dream.
Spreading falsehoods like the "red-brown alliance" I see

The best current evidence for the "red-brown alliance" is supposed Marxists like you constantly going to bat for the likes of Putin and Assad.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.