(yes I understand that's not what you were asking, it's just such a bad question that I had to try and make at least the response funny....
Ha, I get it!!! SO funny! Thank you so much for saving my post!!!
most hand guns would only piss off a boar. Large handguns can only be fired by giants and strong people.
I meant this hypothetically. Texan hunters seem to know how to kill boars without machine guns, so I would assume that they don’t need them. Rifles, handguns, and even bows and arrows are sufficient in killing a boar.
A 8 year old could kill a boar with a proper rifle and he would eventually hit it if he was using a full automatic one.
Who in the right mind would give a rifle to an 8 year old? And why do my children need fully-automatic firearms?? Anyways, what does it say about you if even an 8 year old with a rifle can kill something you would need a machine gun for?
Plus the point is to kill as many of those things as possible, and doing it humanely would be a plus. Handguns are going to kill slower and more painfully.
Not if you know how to aim.
Why hamstring the hunters doing this very valuable service for non-hunters?)
Because banning machine guns wouldn’t just affect hunters; banning machine guns would also take them out of the hands of potential killers.
Poll
