Surprising lack of one-term Presidents? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 10:39:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Surprising lack of one-term Presidents? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Surprising lack of one-term Presidents?  (Read 909 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« on: January 10, 2013, 06:37:06 PM »

As I mentioned during the election, one reason why I was increasingly confident Obama would be re-elected is a pretty simple fact, when G W Bush lost in 1992, he lost by 5% and 202 EVs... and it was the smallest margin for an incumbent president to be defeated... btw, I don't count Ford as it was his first election.

So my point is, incumbency is the most powerful re-election tool a president has. People are inherently conservative when it comes to voting someone out. It generally takes a personal failing which impacts on the country - and that leads to incumbents being thrown out, rather than voted out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.