2018 Congressional Generic Ballot and House Polls Megathread - Part 3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:42:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Generic Ballot and House Polls Megathread - Part 3 (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Generic Ballot and House Polls Megathread - Part 3  (Read 130539 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« on: September 12, 2018, 01:54:12 PM »

Lol



I'm more interested at what whacko at the National Journal thinks the recent polling shows this in the margin of error. Brown has led every legit poll by like 15 on average.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2018, 07:58:57 AM »

Wondering when CNN is going to release their GCB from their poll....
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2018, 04:38:22 PM »

The key is always Trump's approval rating.

He lost by 1 in PA-07. Monmouth has his approval at -2. So..... yeah. That sample might be a bit R-leaning, and it still has Wild up 2-6.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2018, 06:48:05 PM »

Kim has the edge. Monmouth also had him up.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2018, 08:28:08 AM »

I'm a bit surprised people are just writing off OH-12. Balderson barely squeaked it out, and this fall, Dems will have the turnout edge with someone like Brown probably having huge margins in the Senate race. It's definitely plausible for O'Connor to win.

Not to mention, I wouldn't be surprised if the Franklin County margin was even bigger for O'Connor now than it was before after Balderson's remarks sink in. When he said it, it was only like a day before the election.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2018, 06:39:13 AM »

The CA-39 poll also has Trump at 47% approval despite him only getting 43% of the vote in 2016, so... yeah. I find it hard to believe Cisneros is already underwater in a Clinton +8 district.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2018, 07:35:31 AM »


Was not expecting this. Figured Taylor would be down a few. Did Northam win Taylor's district last year?
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2018, 03:11:55 PM »

Already thought Sherrill would likely win but if the best Webber has is an internal of his opponent +3 then.... yeah
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2018, 07:48:46 AM »



Makes sense. DCCC just started airing $$$ there
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2018, 06:14:06 PM »

Guys the poll was freaking D+6 and +9 in the LV model. For the love of god stop nitpicking

I never look at one poll in a vacuum. I do, however, look at this. Dem lead at its lowest level in more than a month.

(Again, those are minor swings compared to what we saw in 2016, but it still means fewer seats for Democrats.)

The Dem lead is about +8, which is basically the average its been for a year
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2018, 06:22:03 AM »


Where’s the Kavanaugh bump? I was told by Beltway pundits that we were going to get a red wave because of the least popular Supreme Court nominee in history. Huh

And just like that... pundits are wrong again. My problem I think with these pundits though is that they are so assured they are right, and then get defensive when presented with evidence that they were wrong.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2018, 07:13:25 AM »


Yeah, I mean I'm not surprised if Taylor is winning but there's no way Kaine is only up +5... Northam even won by 4 and Stewart is an abomination
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2018, 05:47:57 PM »

PA-07

Susan Wild (D) 49%
Marty Nothstein (R) 35%

http://www.wfmz.com/news/pennsylvania/republicans-make-gains-in-second-69-newsdesales-university-poll/807473989
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2018, 08:12:00 PM »

A poll that has 22% undecided this close to the election should be questioned with some scrutiny.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #14 on: October 15, 2018, 08:33:28 PM »

That CNBC poll was conducted by POS (aka, the geniuses behind Rasmussen polls).

Oh. Major grain of salt. Not to mention it's an RV poll 3 weeks out from the election.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2018, 01:02:11 PM »

Statewide polling has been awful. It also doesn't look as of right now as if we're getting any NBC/Marist polls this week, despite it being 3 weeks out.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2018, 12:22:29 PM »


Wild has led by 8, 13, and 7 in the most recent polls.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2018, 04:26:11 PM »

Amy McGrath has the enthusiasm edge and just raised nearly $4 million. Dem turnout in that district in the primary was bananas. But the new WaPo story trying to say her chances are downgrading? Oh ok.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2018, 08:45:57 AM »

I truly think no pollster truly knows how this election is going to turn out. Turnout is a complete tossup. If that NBC/WSJ chart ends up coming to fruition, with Latinos and young people being extremely motivated, that could change a LOT. And likewise, if the opposite happens.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2018, 06:09:23 PM »

PA-07

House: Susan Wild (D) 49%, Marty Nothstein (R) 36%
Governor: Tom Wolf (D) 54%, Scott Wagner (R) 31%
Senate: Bob Casey (D) 53%, Lou Barletta (R) 35%

http://www.wfmz.com/news/lehigh-valley/democrats-looking-good-in-3rd-poll/818430241
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2018, 06:30:30 AM »

Washington Post battleground districts poll: Dems 50 - Reps 47

Was Dems 50 - Reps 46 two weeks ago.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/battleground-house-districts-remain-close-in-new-poll/2018/10/22/e6c77a32-d63e-11e8-aeb7-ddcad4a0a54e_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_battlegroundpolls-705am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #21 on: October 23, 2018, 06:35:26 AM »

Rohrabacher up 2 according to Monmouth. Wow.

Should be noted that Rouda is +2 in the Dem "surge" model.

Not to mention, isn't this a Clinton district? They have Trump's approval at +8, not to mention nearly 50% *strongly* approve, so....
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #22 on: October 23, 2018, 07:15:04 AM »

Reading the article they have a big key state buried in. Indies who dislike both parties (a group that Trump won big in and the GOP won by 14% in 2010 and a similar margin in 2014) favors democrats by 15%

Right, so basically undecideds right now who hate both are leaning towards Ds, which makes sense. So undecideds are likely to break with Ds.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #23 on: October 23, 2018, 07:16:14 AM »

Also getting a Monmouth CA-48 poll tomorrow. It will be interesting to see if the lack of funds for Rohrabacher (both internal and external) has taken effect.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

No one is donating to Rohrabacher's campaign yet he's winning? Doesn't seem to jive. Not to mention *85%* of Rs and Ds being interested is ludicrous. That # is way too high.

The bottom line is that Trump barely got, what, 48% in this district? And now 48% *strongly approve*? That's insane.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,886


« Reply #24 on: October 23, 2018, 08:16:46 AM »

https://winwithjmc.com/archives/8551

GA-6 JMC Analytics: Handel (R-inc) 49, McBath (D) 45

(Gov race here: Kemp 47, Abrams 45)

That's closer than I expected.

I never understood why people thought Handel would do better here than she did in the special election which took place before Trump tried to repeal healthcare. Equally well, I could understand.

I'm triggered by that Handel +4 result.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 10 queries.