How in the world could this happen?!? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 10:51:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How in the world could this happen?!? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How in the world could this happen?!?  (Read 4679 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: February 03, 2005, 10:14:22 AM »

Going back til when?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2005, 08:22:17 AM »

Here's a corrected version. I went with winners' % margin, and went back to 1892 (that's because the Atlas' "Compare state data by year" feature only goes back to 1892)

For some reason, it won't display 90%+ percentages. Therefore, and also to be a little easier on the eyes, all the states are one class lower than they should be, ie states in the 80-90 bracket have the 70+ colour etc.
Here's the list of what election provided the largest win, by state:
1892: Florida
1896: New Hampshire, Vermont, Montana, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Nevada
1904: Minnesota, South Dakota, Oregon
1912: Virginia
1920: New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota, California
1924: Maine, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan
1928: Delaware, Kansas
1932: Georgia, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico
1936: South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Arizona, Washington
1940: North Carolina
1964: Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Maryland, West Virginia, Hawaii
1972: Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Oklahoma
1984: Nebraska, Wyoming, Alaska

As per Ohio: 60% was only cracked twice in that state in the last 112 years, by Hoover and Johnson. Coolidge's MoV was higher than theirs, though, thanks to the split opposition.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2005, 08:32:35 AM »

Forgot something on that list:
2004 - District of Columbia
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2005, 09:34:16 AM »

Here's a more realistic one. States' greatest landslide out of the last 12 elections (since 1960). Colours are normal.

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2005, 09:36:55 AM »

Alabama is I >60.
Of course, this map looks at first glance totally reasonable and likely - except for the percentages.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2005, 10:06:44 AM »

Alabama is I >60.
Of course, this map looks at first glance totally reasonable and likely - except for the percentages.

Revenge of the Rust Belt?
But in that case, why in the heck would Ky. be over 60% Rep?
Maybe both parties campaigned solely on economic issues in the Midwest, solely on social issues in the South?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2005, 09:49:19 AM »

Sorry I didn't respond to this sooner, I'm having loads of trouble with topic reply notifications.

I must have been going with the win margin instead.  I don't know why I was doing that.  Well, thanks for changing it, Lewis.
No, I went with the win margin too.
Maybe you were a little inconsistent and used win margin in some states, winners' percentage in others. That's the impression I got when I went through the data.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.