Racially adjusted 2016 presidential vote by congressional district (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:34:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Racially adjusted 2016 presidential vote by congressional district (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Racially adjusted 2016 presidential vote by congressional district  (Read 1775 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,305
United States


« on: April 23, 2017, 03:52:08 PM »

Great project, though not totally as accurate in the Deep South as in MS all CDs have a high black population (and MS blacks are as Dem as nationally if not more so), though whites in MS CDs are likely the most Republican in the nation, even moreso than TX-13 or TX-11.

Interesting- it looks like Trump won the white vote in every district in the South other than GA-5 (Atlanta) and VA-8 (Arlington), if you count that as the South.  There is one more- NC-4 (Durham) which is right on .147, so it may have gone either way.

Looking at New Hampshire, the guideline is more like at .151 , so the White vote in NC-04 most likely went for Trump, if very narrowly.

I live in NC-4 and the current district is more Chapel Hill and Raleigh than Durham. Durham whites are slightly more liberal than Raleigh whites, so HRC may have carried whites in the 2003-2012 NC-4 or the 2013-2016 NC-4. Either way it's very close. And good to see that we are the second most Democratic whites that are surrounded by the South.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.