Maine Facing Elderly Boom, with Few Young People to Support Them (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:08:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Maine Facing Elderly Boom, with Few Young People to Support Them (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Maine Facing Elderly Boom, with Few Young People to Support Them  (Read 720 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


« on: August 18, 2019, 01:31:59 PM »

I just hope this isn't some way to convince people to vote for treating themselves like breeding cattle. Poland has policies like that. They don't work. Romania's worked for a little while and then they stopped working.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2019, 01:56:09 PM »

A Modest Proposal For Preventing the Elderly People From Being a Burden to Their Children, Neighbors, or Country, and For Making Them Beneficial to the Publick:

America is fundamentally endangered by a growing average age. We must take a three prong approach of: encouraging immigration of foreigners under 25; encouraging young couples to have more children with tax and economic incentives; and cannibalizing the elderly on a sliding scale, starting at the age of sixty.
Questions:
What are the parameters and critical values on this "sliding scale"?
Who would want to eat them?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2019, 07:25:08 AM »

There are a couple of key problems that are apparent in this problem.

1. America doesn't have any kind of organized, non-profit long-term elderly care services available, nor is there a nationwide network of providers and support staff that can be tapped into for struggling areas. These kinds of facilities will only be created when they are sufficiently profitable; considering the location, type of work, and meager pay offered to the most needed of these industry workers, is it a surprise that there is such a shortage? It's not profitable enough to increase benefits and pay to attract talent, so these places lose staff and decline. We need a comprehensive, nationally organized plan to address this problem; both lack of coordination and the profit-motive are hindering this.

2. America doesn't have policies in place to support aspiring families. Long work hours, minimal vacation time, insufficient pay, overpriced housing, expensive healthcare, no paid guaranteed maternal or paternal leave, astronomical childcare costs; with those conditions, how do you really expect people to have more children? If they must struggle to just afford a studio apartment or bedroom in a house with roommates while working over 40 hours per week, then how will they have children and all the expenses associated with them? American policy is extremely anti-natalist.

Bingo. Old people and babies don't have any money and as long as people accept job offers at $45,000 a year instead of holding out for $75,000 a year, they won't ever have enough money to move into a house or at least a two bedroom apartment!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.