Hmm, doesn't it just show that Mc Cain has no ideas to what answering the question because he didn't know what he should answer?
If yes, it would just reveals that, on this issue, Mc Cain has more a vote-catching position than a strong one.
Or, he has really no ideas on the issue. Concerning a 71 years old Republican politician, this would be strange.
Maybe sexual diseases are just nature's way of punishing the sexually immoral.
And maybe they are not. Maybe this is just a random of the nature we have to deal with.
If ever what you say was right, nature don't have the same comportment with moral according to different epochs and different regions. I've never heard speaking about sexual diseases concerning just homosexuals neither in the Antic Greece nor concerning the nobles of the Ottoman Empire (Turkey, around 1400 to 1900), both of them used to practice homosexuality, and there are maybe others trough times and regions about who I don't think here for who homosexuality was normal and who hasn't been touched by disease because of this.
Maybe Europeans are on to something. Maybe we in America do overthink certain things. That doesn't mean we should put our guard down, but we shouldn't be making arguments for argument's sake.
