#FireBoehner (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 09:35:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  #FireBoehner (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: #FireBoehner  (Read 3306 times)
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« on: December 07, 2012, 06:40:31 PM »

Who would be some possibilities for those 16 votes?

Amash, Huelskamp, Schweikert, Jones and Gohmert are the five most likely suspects... I guess the next tier after that would be people like Jim Jordan, Mick Mulvaney, Tom McClintock and other rebellious members of the RSC: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Study_Committee
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2012, 02:34:50 PM »

So I looked it up, and the rule/precedent is that the speaker has to win a majority of votes cast for people. In 1997, for example, Gingrich was reelected Speaker with less than an absolute majority of the chamber, due to abstentions.

This means two things-

1. the hypothetical rebellious congressmen need to actually cast a vote for someone (Congressman or not), not just vote present, for this to work.
2. Democrats can more easily manipulate the election because they won't even need to vote for Boehner, they only have to abstain.

Edit, source: this CRS report

I'm not sure #1 is true. If enough GOP members vote present, then Pelosi receives more votes than Boehner and she is elected Speaker.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2012, 03:24:47 PM »

So I looked it up, and the rule/precedent is that the speaker has to win a majority of votes cast for people. In 1997, for example, Gingrich was reelected Speaker with less than an absolute majority of the chamber, due to abstentions.

This means two things-

1. the hypothetical rebellious congressmen need to actually cast a vote for someone (Congressman or not), not just vote present, for this to work.
2. Democrats can more easily manipulate the election because they won't even need to vote for Boehner, they only have to abstain.

Edit, source: this CRS report

I'm not sure #1 is true. If enough GOP members vote present, then Pelosi receives more votes than Boehner and she is elected Speaker.

There's a pretty large gap there.  They'd need over 30 abstentions for that to be the case, while they'd only need 16 Republicans voting for someone else to gridlock it over and over until Boehner gives in.  The latter is far more likely.

I suppose voting present would require more votes, yes. And it doesn't create gridlock, it just elects Nancy Pelosi.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.