So far, the only one in this thread who has acknowledged the details of the situation absolves the ignorance of his comrades because of a miniscule issue over Romney's semantics.
With politics conducted like this, one wonders why the nation is so screwed. 
The political debate should be over the plans and the details of the plans, not lies based on completely the willfull ignorance of the many and justified by the knowledgable few, on the basis that Romney is as bad a writer as he is a politician.
Spare us this ridiculous claptrap. Did or did Romney not oppose the decision to provide a federally funded bailout to the auto companies at the time the Obama Administration did it? Can you even acknowledge this?
From Romney's editorial:
This isn't a confusing situation. Romney, like most of the GOP Presidential candidates, opposed the federally funded auto bailout that the Obama Administration provided. But the bailout has not caused the death of the American auto industry that he predicted. And so now ...
