So, your argument is that the US military should help filmmakers when they ask, no matter the cause, in the making of movies. Do they only have to be BIG STUDIO films or can any jackass with a steady cam call? How far do they have to bend? How many tax dollars should they spend? Obviously they can't help every jackass with a steady cam, so who draws the line? Do you let the DoD draw the line, no you probably wouldn't. What if the liberal thinker you put in charge of making that choice makes the DoD help in a movie they know will hurt them in the public light, a movie that is total fiction. Exactly how helpful do you think the military is going to be? If you want the US military to help make movies and TV shows, you have to let them decided who does what. Anything else is unreasonable and unfair.
Again, if that's censorship (of a type) to you, we'll have to agree to disagree.
I never said that they should help filmmakers when they asked. I merely pointed out that it can be seen as a form of censorship because non-compliance historically could completely sink a film. I don't like your insinuation that I 'probably wouldn't' let the Department of Defence decide. Personally I would say that if a script makes an entirely baseless attack on the military then of course they should refuse to help them. I'm not saying the Department of Defence is 'wrong' to interfere if they are helping with a film, just that this is a form of censorship.