The worst the best and the likely. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:39:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  The worst the best and the likely. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The worst the best and the likely.  (Read 1869 times)
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« on: September 26, 2004, 09:28:21 PM »
« edited: September 26, 2004, 09:35:04 PM by HockeyDude »

Would you Democrats stop insulting Virginia? Kansas will go Kerry before we will.

shut up, you know that's not true.  Virginia is not the conserative capital of the world dude.

Anyhoo

BEST CASE FOR KERRY   406 - 132



BEST CASE FOR BUSH  358 - 180

Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2004, 09:37:53 PM »

Shira--

1988 was a landslide.
1992 Ross Perot got 13%
1996 Ross Perot got 6%
2000 was less than the 1988 landslide

So 1992 and 1996 can't be used. What you're really saying is that Bush got less of the VA vote than his father.

The Republican numbers are:
45% 1992
47% 1996
52% 2000

The Democrat numbers are:
41% 1992
45% 1996
44% 2000

So the trend is what now?

are you completely oblivious to the fact perot affected the election greatly in 92 and 96, and that the voting patterns of the DC suburbs have trended dem for a long time now?  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.