Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 07:21:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?
#1
yes (D)
 
#2
no (D)
 
#3
yes (R)
 
#4
no (R)
 
#5
yes (I)
 
#6
no (I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?  (Read 1872 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« on: March 25, 2012, 03:03:43 AM »

Regardless, even if it is technically more accurate, the term "racist" should never be applied to animals, because it denigrates the term by the implication that any treatment of animals can be equated to the mistreatment of humans through that ideology known as racism. In other words, if you lynch a black guy for being black, it's "racism", no worse than if you shot a black dog for being black. Which is ironic because the consideration of black guys as no better than dogs is a hallmark of racism. The very use of the term in this way, is, ironically, in itself racist.

     But any person can be a victim of racist crimes, so really it would have to imply that all people are no better than dogs. While a disturbing implication, it is hardly a racist one. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.