Lumine/Rpryor for President/Vice-President (Defense Policy) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 09:31:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Lumine/Rpryor for President/Vice-President (Defense Policy) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Lumine/Rpryor for President/Vice-President (Defense Policy)  (Read 4359 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,236
United States


« on: September 24, 2017, 01:16:43 AM »

I realize you are opposed to the bicameralist system, but we passed the CR in less than a week. The Budget Process and Control Act in 3 weeks. There are processes for simultaneous consideration of bills now The last 3 VPs in a row have been actively engaged in the proceedings of Congress and their work has kept bills flowing, passing through both chambers and on to the President.

This may have been accurate six months ago, but it is not the case now. In the Fourth Congress, one bill was put on my desk. In the Fifth Congress, over a dozen was placed on DFW's desk.

     I've been VP for less than two weeks and Congress has already passed seven bills and resolutions under my watch. Bicameralism absolutely has what it takes to work as a system; it just needs active people in charge. If we abolish game mechanics that have only struggled due to the inactivity of some past officeholders, then we are only lowering standards when what we should be doing is rising to the occasion ourselves.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,236
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2017, 05:11:30 PM »

    Nobody is suggesting that voting for you should disqualify a Federalist from running for office. Now if they want to run as being more-conservative-than-thou after having done so, of course they are going to be called out for it.

But I'm pretty sure that is exactly what just happened above?

Surely you of all people can remember that the elections to which Old Man Yankee et al are referring were largely depolarized affairs, centered around saving this game from the destructive forces (including excessive regionalism!) that had plagued it for too long. Many people - including one-third of conservatives in October 2015 - voted for me because they understood that I was the best choice to ensure the radical forces were defeated and that game reform was successfully implemented - and they were right.

What's the excuse now?

     And two-thirds of conservatives voted against you because we didn't want a Labor President. For one of that one-third to be upset over the party nominating a Presidential candidate who does not have a sterling conservative record going back to the dawn of time is stunningly tone-deaf to those of us who did care about contesting the Presidency.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.