Why was 2000 so close? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 11:38:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was 2000 so close? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was 2000 so close?  (Read 21431 times)
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,061
United States


« on: January 19, 2013, 01:23:43 PM »

As others stated, one party had the presidency for eight years in a row.  In addition, the economy had thinned by late 2000 and that made a difference.  Bush was thought to be well-ahead until late Oct when the drunk driving past came up and that nearly did it for Gore.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,061
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2013, 09:35:07 PM »

Again, a lot of this is the economy.  By the middle of 2000, the economy had started thinning, the stock market was declining and many pocketbooks were "feeling it".  Clinton disappeared the second half of 2000 and many potentially attributed the thinning economy (incorrectly of course) to Gore as Clinton all but let him run things the latter part of the year.
Logged
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,061
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2016, 10:40:57 PM »

People still vote their wallets and the economy was thinning starting in Q2'2000.  Nader hurt him, but Gore distancing himself from Clinton and the overall record of the eight years is what lost it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.