MASS - sorry to be blunt, do you even know what you're talking about when you say the Republicans will gain "a lot" of Senate seats in 2010?
nope just makeing it up as I go along.
Try looking at the map. It's these plus DE and the other NY seat. There's no way that it'd be that great for the Republicans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2004
I'd say these Democratic seats *might* be vulnerable: CO, IN, IL, NV. IN is safe with Bayh. IL is probably safe with a non Blago tainted candidate. I'd be happy to see a Republican win in NV.
In any case, there are a lot more potentially vulnerable Republicans.
yeah I see what your saying but its hard for me to imagine that the democrats would win three conggressional elections in a row, I could be wrong but doesn't that buck historic trends?
this is all from Dave site going back to 1990.
in 2008 the DEMS gained 8 seats counting franken
2006 the DEMS gained 6 seats
in 2002 the GOP gained 2 seats
in 2000 the dems gained 4 seats
1998 there was 0 net gain for ether party
1996 the GOP gained 2 seats
in 1994 the GOP gained 7 seats
in 1992 there was no net gain for either party
in 1990 the DEM's gained one seat.