Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:40:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the Weimar Republic have legally banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933?
#1
Yes, to prevent the Third Reich from being established
 
#2
No, it would be undemocratic and dictatorial, the very thing the Weimer Republic's supporters claimed to be against
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933?  (Read 3614 times)
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,675
United States


« on: March 06, 2024, 03:26:12 PM »
« edited: March 06, 2024, 03:30:57 PM by All Along The Watchtower »

The Nazis didn’t actually have an election majority though. And in the last Reichstag election before Hitler was appointed Chancellor the Nazis had actually lost seats, though they remained the largest party (ie., they had a plurality of seats)
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,675
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2024, 03:37:02 PM »

Franz von Papen had essentially ended democracy in Prussia in 1932 because he didn't like that a coalition was impossible without the support of at least one of the Nazis or Communists. This ended helping the Nazis quite a bit in the long run and Papen deserves a lot of the blame for Hitler becoming dictator.

At the federal level, an argument could be made for Brüning being the man who had ended Weimar democracy, who was the last Chancellor before Papen, Schleicher, and Hitler.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,675
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2024, 09:20:36 PM »

Franz von Papen had essentially ended democracy in Prussia in 1932 because he didn't like that a coalition was impossible without the support of at least one of the Nazis or Communists. This ended helping the Nazis quite a bit in the long run and Papen deserves a lot of the blame for Hitler becoming dictator.

At the federal level, an argument could be made for Brüning being the man who had ended Weimar democracy, who was the last Chancellor before Papen, Schleicher, and Hitler.

The idiots in the SPD bringing down Mueller in 1930, IMO.

A bad move, yes. And they couldn't prevent the KPD's increased popularity in any case.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,675
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2024, 11:15:46 PM »

The KPD's Thaelmann deserves one such big black mark as well though he found out being a supplicant to Joe Stalin just means you get left to the horror of 11 years of solitary confinement interspersed with whatever the Nazis did to him that he didn't manage to smuggle out to the world about.

And it turns out that many years of calling the major left-wing party in Germany "social fascists" didn't exactly endear the KPD to the Social Democrats. Can't imagine why they didn't cooperate with the Communists!
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,675
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2024, 02:16:12 PM »

Would the NSDAP just have a stand in like Strasser or Goering be appointed in his place, and then smooth the way for Hitler once the regime was consolidated like Campora did for Peron in 1972?
Even if Hitler dissapeared, other nazi would take his place.

Perhaps a more competent, less egotistical, and less meth driven Nazi.

So not a Nazi then.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,675
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2024, 03:16:45 PM »

Would the NSDAP just have a stand in like Strasser or Goering be appointed in his place, and then smooth the way for Hitler once the regime was consolidated like Campora did for Peron in 1972?
Even if Hitler dissapeared, other nazi would take his place.

Perhaps a more competent, less egotistical, and less meth driven Nazi.

So not a Nazi then.

?

I'm saying that there would've been a fascist that came to power regardless. Hitler wasn't a good leader even ignoring the genocide he perpetuated. He was insecure, ego-driven, and thought he knew more than his generals. He wasn't very competent. A competent fascistic leader in Germany would've made things much more difficult.

And I'm saying that a competent Nazi or indeed, fascist (more broadly) leader is an oxymoron.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.