I think if there was fire, we would have seen fire, not just smoke.
And that is not an answer to my question at all.
That's a smokescreen of an answer. It's a fake answer. It's avoiding the question at hand. It's a weak response.
If these accusations were against Obama, what would your thoughts be? I'm fairly certain we all know the answer to that.
Oh I think my answer was fine. Cosby's on trial. Clinton's history is written. These don't seem to have gotten past the accusation stage of a high profile target. They could have all lawyered up and had their voices heard, filed criminal charges, filed dozens of lawsuits........no fire.
They did.
Either you didn't bold far enough in your quote back or you just quoted the smoke.
Sorry dude. It's pretty obvious from your construction that they "could have" done something (which they did do) that you were including the bolded part in the "fire" and simply were not aware it had occurred.
Oh I admit I didn't know they lawyered up. But I need more than that to compare him to Clinton or Cosby like the other guy was babbling on about.
LOL, Clinton has far fewer accusers, and they accuse him of less and with a much lower probability of being true.