High Authority for Ethics in Voting Bill [Debating]

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

What is the obsession with post count and participation in Atlasia? It seems like the whole goal is to lock political opponents of yours into some sort of catch-22. If new members start to participate, they are attacked as zombies taking orders, so they end up avoiding Atlasia completely, which in turn lets you talk about how they are zombies who never post.

As a victim of this slander myself, it is getting old.

Maybe they don't post, cuz they, um, have a job, or something normal like that.

LOL, that's got to hurt.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

This legislation has nothing to do with post counts. Reading the legislation more carefully would reveal that important aspect of this bill.

Hmm, true, its actually almost completely subject to the arbitrary whims of some dictatorial "High Authority."

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

This legislation has nothing to do with post counts. Reading the legislation more carefully would reveal that important aspect of this bill.

Hmm, true, its actually almost completely subject to the arbitrary whims of some dictatorial "High Authority."

Rules and individuals which must be confirmed by the Senate, issuing decisions that must be agreed upon unanimously, followed up the appeal to the Supreme Court to overturn their decisions.

It's abundantly clear you don't have a clue what you're talking about here, and are simply flocking to Hamilton (you must enjoy his.. company.. if you catch my drift) just to cause a ruckus and hope that a bunch of ignorant trolling, scaremongering, and debunked procedural worries derail the process.

This is the Senate. A deliberative body. If you have something intelligent to contribute, then please, feel free. Otherwise, I kindly has you to take you uneducated opinions on this bill elsewhere.

But of course. After all, the whole point of this bill is to institutionalize the idea that only you and your boyfriends should be allowed to participate in Atlasia.