NE1: Stimulating Research in Basic Sciences Act of 2012 - the STAR Act

[Barnes]

This bill is well-founded, but I believe it needs to be more specific in its intent and mission.  For example, the first section states the funding shall be given to "small-scale research institutions" withouth stating precisely what that is.  Following on from that, what exactly is this research intended for?  I totally support the idea of this bill, but it needs to be further clarified and explained within the actual text.

[Barnes]

Basic science, I'm pretty sure that's made clear.

In what field; for what purpose; to what end; to meet what goals?

[Barnes]

Basic science, I'm pretty sure that's made clear.

In what field; for what purpose; to what end; to meet what goals?

I'm certain I explain that in my initial advocation.

You don't seem to understand, none of this is specified within the actual text of your legislation. This bill has no actual goals or requirements. I totally support research for the sake of science, but with such a large investment from the government, I would like to see specified areas of investment and return. This is somewhat stated in section three, but it needs to be expanded upon. I don't mean to choke scientific thought and discovery, but perhaps we can consult with the scientific community to find areas that they deem are in need of investment; from this research, we can inteligently plan where to spend our funds the most effectively.

[Barnes]

I very much want to support this bill, but if the concerns made by the Governor and myself are not addressed in some way I simply can't.

[Barnes]

I move for the bill to be tabled.

Ah well, if that is your prerogative I am sorry. Hopefully, we will pass legislation in the future that will accomplish the same as this, as well as meet our above stated concerns.