Does the preceeding poster stick to a coherent ideology? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:44:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Does the preceeding poster stick to a coherent ideology? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does the preceeding poster stick to a coherent ideology?  (Read 6865 times)
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


« on: March 13, 2010, 10:18:43 PM »

He actually ran to the right of Hoover in 1932, but yeah voting for him in 1936, 1940, or 1944 would be strange. It'd probably be as bad as voting Mondale over Reagan. Right NiK? Tongue
Logged
President Mitt
Giovanni
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,347
Samoa


« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2010, 10:58:37 PM »
Quote from: Libertas Omnibus on March 13, 2010, 10:51:28 PM
Quote from: Mad Hatter on March 13, 2010, 10:18:43 PM

He actually ran to the right of Hoover in 1932, but yeah voting for him in 1936, 1940, or 1944 would be strange. It'd probably be as bad as voting Mondale over Reagan. Right NiK? Tongue

I'm not so sure about FDR running to the right of Hoover on economic policy...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

(skip)

I'd disagree. I don't think Roosevelt had thought up his New Deal during the election. His main criticisms of Hoover were:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.