See anything unusual here? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:27:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  See anything unusual here? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: See anything unusual here?  (Read 3271 times)
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« on: May 21, 2012, 04:19:21 PM »

From the 2010 Enfield CT election results. These were the official results reported to the SotS.

Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2012, 04:39:59 PM »

Wait, wait, this one's just too funny:



20 errors and counting in the 2010 SOV.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2012, 05:07:43 PM »

Haha, wow. Good finds!

What sort of voting system does CT use, by the way?

Optical scan. Paper ballots fed into a machine. Our ballots look like this.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2012, 04:51:34 PM »

http://www.norwalkct.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/1259

See anything unusual in district 140B? Wink

How can they not see an outrageous total like that for a very minor third party candidate? When this error gets corrected, Mertens' statewide vote total will drop by 1.5%.

22 errors and counting in the 2010 SOV.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2012, 08:32:38 AM »

Found some weird stuff in a 2008 report from Bristol yesterday. The Republican candidate for Registrar of Voters seems to be missing anywhere from 1500 to 2000 votes in her official tally as reported by the Secretary of the State, and Larson is missing about 500 from the Working Families line.

News at eleven...
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2012, 09:28:41 PM »

Holy shit...

After looking over their district-by-district tally, I think that Stamford, CT may have counted its absentee ballots twice over in 2010.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2012, 06:26:24 PM »

So what chance is there that Foley actually won? Tongue

Even if Stamford counted its absentees twice over, I'd still need to find 6,000 lost Foley votes for that to be the case. Then again, those 6,000 are probably all in Bridgeport, and I'm still waiting on their results. Grin
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2012, 09:05:24 AM »

You have to use a number two pencil?

Black marker. Pencils would break or need to be sharpened multiple times during voting day.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2012, 10:21:13 PM »

So I spent an hour today in the basement of an abandoned school with the Registrar of Voters in [withheld], CT. We looked through old boxes in search of tally sheets from past elections because they weren't at the Town Clerk's office at City Hall. Nothing labeled, nothing organized, everything relies upon the memory and experience of the officials currently in office.

Needless to say, record-keeping in some of Connecticut's decaying industrial cities isn't exactly impressive.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.