Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 02:06:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 71780 times)
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« on: February 27, 2010, 09:10:06 PM »
A very sensible ruling by the court.  It is the AG's job to prosecute violations of the law.  To say that he must be directly affected by the violation- i.e. "have standing"- prevents him from doing his job.
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2010, 05:03:31 AM »
Huh?  The defendant is accused of violating the federal CONSTITUTION.
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2010, 05:13:43 AM »
« Edited: February 28, 2010, 07:53:25 AM by Senator Fritz »
I really don't understand your reasoning.  The constitution has been violated.   The AG, according to you, is there to enforce the laws of the Republic of Atlasia.  This includes the constitution.
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2010, 05:29:14 AM »
Well then, we disagree.

Maybe a real lawyer could explain this.  Badger, you out there?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.