The Imperial Dominion of the South's Legislature (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 09:51:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Imperial Dominion of the South's Legislature (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23
Author Topic: The Imperial Dominion of the South's Legislature  (Read 302340 times)
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2010, 04:01:03 PM »

Let's try to keep this on the front page people.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #51 on: October 28, 2010, 07:19:33 PM »

As per Emperor PiT's request, I am now sponsoring this bill.  If you have any objections please let them be known.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #52 on: October 29, 2010, 04:56:15 PM »

For the record, I support the bill in its current form.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #53 on: October 29, 2010, 06:36:00 PM »

Because neither Svenssen nor Deldem has voiced an opinion I will debate open for another 24 hours.  The vote on this bill will take place at roughly this time tomorrow.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #54 on: October 29, 2010, 09:07:10 PM »

Because neither Svenssen nor Deldem has voiced an opinion I will debate open for another 24 hours.  The vote on this bill will take place at roughly this time tomorrow.

This is not your job. Debate will end roughly Saturday night, and a 24 hour vote will follow. I am still here. Your job is to debate. My job is scheduling votes.

You take care of your job, I'll take care of mine.
My bad.  I joined when PiT was speaker.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #55 on: October 30, 2010, 04:43:55 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #56 on: October 30, 2010, 04:45:14 PM »

A quorum is two people, right?  What happens if we don't get a quorum to vote?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #57 on: October 31, 2010, 10:30:43 AM »

Aye.

I apologize for not being able to look into this earlier, I've been extremely busy recently due to midterms and such.
That's perfectly ok.  Sorry if I am coming across as too pushy.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #58 on: October 31, 2010, 11:53:21 AM »

Reposted from the Legislation Introduction thread
___________________________________________________________________________________
Unborn Child Protection Act

1.  Noting that...
  • With current medical technology, babies can survive outside of the womb during the third  trimester, as evidenced by the plethora of prematurely born babies that survive to become healthy individuals.
  • Ending the life of a prematurely born baby is illegal.
2.  On that basis, the Unborn Child Protection Act seeks to extend that protection to fetus's in the third trimester.  All abortions carried out during the 3rd Trimester of pregancy are hereby illegal
3.  Any physician who knowingly performs an abortion in the third trimester shall be fined under this titled or imprisoned for not more than two years or both.
4.  Exceptions to this law may be made in the case of a threat to the mother's health, rape, or incest.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #59 on: November 01, 2010, 07:49:12 AM »

     Anyway, I will be happy to sign this bill, provided that a clause is included to repeal the Abortion Initiative.
I feel dumb now.  My bill would do exactly the same thing as this already existing law. Shocked
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #60 on: November 02, 2010, 08:11:47 AM »

     Anyway, I will be happy to sign this bill, provided that a clause is included to repeal the Abortion Initiative.
I feel dumb now.  My bill would do exactly the same thing as this already existing law. Shocked

     Actually, your bill, with my change, would legalize second trimester abortions (should probably repeal the South Carolina & Louisiana bills too while we're at it). Now that's change I can believe in. Wink
1.  Isn't 90 days a trimester?
2.  Why do South Carolina each have independent bills?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #61 on: November 02, 2010, 03:22:47 PM »

It seems like abortion in the third trimester is already illegal.

So, let's table my proposal and move on.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #62 on: November 02, 2010, 06:09:44 PM »

As I said earlier, my bill appears to be the duplicate of an already existing law.  As such I would prefer we move on to other matters.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #63 on: November 03, 2010, 04:00:30 PM »

     And there are others who would prefer that we stay on this matter.
Ok then, let's stay on it.  What I'm saying is that the bill I introduced is already on the books.  I don't know what good pursuing it would do.  I am totalling open to someone else drafting a bill in a similiar vein has actual difference, though.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #64 on: November 03, 2010, 04:47:48 PM »

Maybe I am missing something obvious, but doesn't the bill, even with Svensson's amendment still substitute an apple for an apple?  I don't see the difference between the two laws other than word choice.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #65 on: November 03, 2010, 09:05:11 PM »

Maybe I am missing something obvious, but doesn't the bill, even with Svensson's amendment still substitute an apple for an apple?  I don't see the difference between the two laws other than word choice.

Your bill, plus my amendment, would push the abortion ban back another trimester, making it illegal only in the third.
Doesn't the Abortion Ban law only refer to the last trimester (90 day period)?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #66 on: November 04, 2010, 03:59:39 PM »

Maybe I am missing something obvious, but doesn't the bill, even with Svensson's amendment still substitute an apple for an apple?  I don't see the difference between the two laws other than word choice.

Your bill, plus my amendment, would push the abortion ban back another trimester, making it illegal only in the third.
Doesn't the Abortion Ban law only refer to the last trimester (90 day period)?

"It shall be against the law to induce an abortion in the Southeast Region after the 90th day of the pregnancy except in the case of a severe threat to the mother's health."

Basically, abortion is illegal, as it is, after three months - only one trimester.
Yes exactly.  And my bill would also only make it illegal for one trimester, i.e. 90 days.  So I don't see the difference.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #67 on: November 05, 2010, 07:50:26 AM »

Maybe I am missing something obvious, but doesn't the bill, even with Svensson's amendment still substitute an apple for an apple?  I don't see the difference between the two laws other than word choice.

Your bill, plus my amendment, would push the abortion ban back another trimester, making it illegal only in the third.
Doesn't the Abortion Ban law only refer to the last trimester (90 day period)?

"It shall be against the law to induce an abortion in the Southeast Region after the 90th day of the pregnancy except in the case of a severe threat to the mother's health."

Basically, abortion is illegal, as it is, after three months - only one trimester.
Yes exactly.  And my bill would also only make it illegal for one trimester, i.e. 90 days.  So I don't see the difference.

     He means that it is currently legal for only one trimester. Passing this bill would legalize second trimester abortions (& in Louisiana & South Carolina, first trimester abortions as well).
Oh, my was misreading the other bill.  My apologies.  Is there anything else that needs to be debated or can we move on to the voting?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #68 on: November 06, 2010, 10:27:52 PM »

Aye.
Aye.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #69 on: November 08, 2010, 09:45:34 PM »

Unborn Child Protection Act

X Imperial Speaker Yelnoc
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #70 on: November 09, 2010, 03:36:31 PM »

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

A special election for the position of Lord of Darkness (Lt. Governor) will be held at a (as of yet) unspecified but presumably soon time.  If you would like to stand for election to this position, please declare your candidacy in the "Candidate Declaration Thread" over in the "Atlas Fantasy Elections" board.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #71 on: November 13, 2010, 09:28:31 AM »

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

I would like to remind all citizens of the IDS that the assembly elections will be held in about a weeks time.  If you would like to run for election or reelection to the IDS Legislature but have not yet declared your candidacy I suggest you do so as soon as possible.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #72 on: November 13, 2010, 11:11:45 AM »
« Edited: November 14, 2010, 01:15:48 PM by Imperial Speaker Yelnoc »

Reposted from the legislation introduction thread.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #73 on: November 13, 2010, 09:23:41 PM »

How am I to ensure that my minions are properly armed with such restrictions?
If you remember, you are a high-ranking government official.  Notice the exception to this bil....
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


« Reply #74 on: November 14, 2010, 01:15:04 PM »

     Two things:

     1. Aren't these things all illegal on the federal level already? I have no interest in the passage of gun control legislation stronger than that put into place by the federal government.

     2. Who are we to say that someone that violates a regional law is to serve time in federal prison? I'm not sure if it violates any sort of federal law, but they would be well within their rights to refuse us the use of them.
1.  I'm pretty sure that this legislation is stronger than the federal one.
2.  "Federal" was a typo, I will fix it Shocked
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 8 queries.