Ironclad Federalism (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:06:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Ironclad Federalism (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ironclad Federalism  (Read 1365 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« on: July 11, 2012, 07:22:39 AM »

Awesome stuff. I look forward to reading this in the future. Couple of things: back then, no candidate ever announced a run for the Presidency (except for an exception when Charles C. Pinckney straight up broke that rule, as I recall), they instead sat back, denied political ambitions, and allowed their surrogates to nominate them at the party caucus. In Jefferson's case, for example, his candidacy in 1796 was almost completely the work of Madison. Also, it's unlikely that the Republicans would nominated two Virginians. Not only does this lack regional balance, but VA's electoral votes would have to go to Jefferson and another candidate. Given it's 1792, the Republicans are likely to nominate who they did in RL for the Vice Presidency, NY Governor George Clinton.

Still, this is well written and well done. I look forward to seeing the first (of many?) Adams term.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,357
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2012, 03:41:00 PM »

I have high hopes for the Adams Presidency, though he may tick off more than a few of his colleagues and advisors.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.