Voter Enthusiasm Poll (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:31:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Voter Enthusiasm Poll (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Compared to previous elections, are you more enthusiastic about voting than usual, or less enthusiastic?
#1
Liberal (more enthusiastic)
 
#2
Liberal (less enthusiastic)
 
#3
Labor (more enthusiastic)
 
#4
Labor (less enthusiastic)
 
#5
Whig (more enthusiastic)
 
#6
Whig (less enthusiastic)
 
#7
Populare/IFP (more enthusiastic)
 
#8
Populare/IFP (less enthusiastic)
 
#9
Moderate (more enthusiastic)
 
#10
Moderate (less enthusiastic)
 
#11
Independent/Other (more enthusiastic)
 
#12
Independent/Other (less enthusiastic)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 37

Author Topic: Voter Enthusiasm Poll  (Read 853 times)
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« on: February 09, 2012, 06:23:10 PM »

Since I am running myself, I am obviously more enthusiastic about the election than usual. However, even if I didn't run I would probably feel more excited because this election offers so much more than the last one (in terms of the number of tickets and debates).
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2012, 05:54:38 AM »
« Edited: February 10, 2012, 06:07:05 AM by Assemblyman of the Mideast ZuWo »

Since I am running myself, I am obviously more enthusiastic about the election than usual. However, even if I didn't run I would probably feel more excited because this election offers so much more than the last one (in terms of the number of tickets and debates).

Really? I thought last election was such an epic battle, so to speak. It really seems like everyone put up their best and there was everything on the table. Dissolution never could have happened under Duke.

We didn't even have a presidential or vice-presidential debate (calls for public debates were ignored) and the election campaign was pretty lame overall (compare, for example, the length and content of the campaign threads in this and the last election). The voting patterns were also very predictable and it was clear from the beginning that any candidate outside of the RPP or JCP would not have the slightest chance. That's why I wasn't very enthusiastic about the last election. In this election, however, there is a frontrunner (Polnut) but since there are so many tickets in the race the election is a lot less predictable.

Why do you think dissolution could not have happened under Duke?
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2012, 06:13:30 AM »

It would not make sense for the RPP to dissolve following such a resounding comeback. The RPP "won" December. That is my personal hypothesis.

Ok, that may be true. If Duke had won in October, dissolution may have had to wait a bit longer, but I am convinced that it would have happened anyway sooner or later. Too many people among all Atlasian parties were just bored with the continuous dominance of the two big parties.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 14 queries.