SENATE BILL: Home and Private Schooling Tax Credit Act (Vetoed, Sustained)

[ZuWo]

I suggest you familiarize yourself with the definition of "nationalization," Governor.

Nationalization is "bringing under the ownership or control of a nation". You're removing the right of regions to decide how to educate their students and bringin g it under the control of the nation. I support allowing regions to have more determination in education policy.

This is not true. The bill merely subsidizes a particular form of education, so to speak. In no way does it take away any right from the regions to determine how students should be educated.

And you didn't have any problems with the concept of "nationalization" when you introduced a bill that made it impossible for the regions to ban medical marijuana, so be sincere and don't try to present yourself as a friend of regional rights.

[ZuWo]

I suggest you familiarize yourself with the definition of "nationalization," Governor.

Nationalization is "bringing under the ownership or control of a nation". You're removing the right of regions to decide how to educate their students and bringin g it under the control of the nation. Weight support allowing regions to have more determination in education policy.

This is not true. The bill merely subsidizes a particular form of education, so to speak. In no way does it take away any right from the regions to determine how students should be educated.

And you didn't have any problems with the concept of "nationalization" when you introduced a bill that made it impossible for the regions to ban medical marijuana, so be sincere and don't try to present yourself as a friend of regional rights.

Healthcare is the responsibility of the national government so related policy is fine at a national level. All Atlasians deserve access to the best healthcare. Education is different. Education is the domain of the regions and a one size fits all policy would be inappropriate. If you can't see the difference, that is your logical failing, not mine.

There was no need to include medical marijuana in the national health care bill. Not only is it disputed how effective the use of marijuana for medical purposes is, but the addition of more and more forms of medical treatment to the federal health care insurance also makes health care coverage even more expensive. The reason why medical marijuana was added to the list of covered forms of medical treatment was purely political, and you did not care about the individual regions and their stance on medical marijuana when you introduced that unnecessary bill. Thus, your criticism of the concept of nationalization regarding this educational bill is completely implausible. You only care about regional rights when it is politically convenient, but not because you really believe in the importance of regional rights.