SENATE BILL: Trial, Not Turnout Amendment (Sent to the Regions) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 04:15:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Trial, Not Turnout Amendment (Sent to the Regions) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Trial, Not Turnout Amendment (Sent to the Regions)  (Read 6485 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« on: December 13, 2012, 04:01:15 PM »

There is absolutely NO logical justification for bringing regional office-holders into the process.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2012, 04:15:51 PM »

My justification was that this senate would likely impeach you if articles of impeachment were ever introduced, whereas your chances might be a bit better if the regional executives were involved. If you'd like to concentrate the impeachment power in just ten politicians and trust their judgement, I'll withdraw my suggestion altogether.

My thinking was that including the regional executives would show that we're trying to be more represenatative of The People, as this amendment would completely remove their voice from the impeachment process otherwise. Moreover, it's not like the regions are detached from events that happen at the federal level. They're just as much a part of Atlasia.

I don't care about my "chances". I care about a fair and sensible process. There's no reason to change the amendment process in any way, shape or form. If a change is made, however, it certainly need not involve regional officeholders.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2012, 11:10:55 AM »

I can't really believe we're at the point where some think the Senate should have the sole and easy authority to impeach anyone they want. Christ, guys. Really? This body, which has made a ton of mistakes, constantly overlooks things, and is far too easily swayed in a landslide to one side of one issue or another depending on the month, should be entrusted with the ability to impeach anyone with a 2/3rds majority?

Please, guys. I know you hate Napoleon, but 7 people do not deserve that power. Not at all. We shouldn't have that power, and we don't deserve it, either.

It merely takes a simple majority in the public vote to impeach someone. If impeachment is truly deserved, that should be trivial to achieve.

At least he's trying to do something this time he got elected? I don't know.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.