SENATE BILL: The Atlasian Clean National Park Initiative (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 03:27:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The Atlasian Clean National Park Initiative (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The Atlasian Clean National Park Initiative (Law'd)  (Read 2210 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« on: June 28, 2013, 04:12:26 PM »

I will take it
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2013, 05:18:20 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sorry Yankee I wanted to rewrite the bill first.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2013, 07:58:50 PM »

Hostile
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2013, 08:50:27 AM »

The littering issue is covered extensively in sec tion 2.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2013, 09:41:22 AM »

Enforcing a smoking ban is no more managable than a litter fine. A campfire is far more likely to start a wildfire than cigarettes, which are designed and engineered to be fire safe.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2013, 10:13:22 AM »

"Blamed" "may have" "think"

Sounds like there's a lot more confidence than speculation.

Are we going to ban campfires too?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2013, 11:29:07 AM »

I would support banning campfires outside of designated fire rings; several national parks do this IRL.

Ok. But there's no reason not to allow smoking in those same areas.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2013, 11:52:44 AM »

I've named several reasons why smoking shouldn't be allowed in those areas.

I don't agree with them though.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2013, 07:34:28 PM »

Nay
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2013, 11:39:47 PM »

I'm willing to entertain a compromise on this. My idea would be to use a certain fuel economy threshold to prohibit major polluters from our parks, but preserve the convenient means of travel families use to enjoy our parks. If you can't get behind this, though, I'm fine with the current text.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2013, 10:23:23 AM »

Hostile. It sounds nice but obviously will have the same material effect as your previous amendmnt. Creative but I won't support it.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2013, 06:30:41 PM »

I miss the Nix that had a sense of humor and wasn't trying to ban whatever popped into his head that morning. Sad

Anyway people who are bothered by the noise of a motorboat should probably find another place to stay. Airplane noise can be annoying- lets make the whole country a no fly zone. All that pollution and it can hurt the birds...
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2013, 10:46:01 AM »


My amendment
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #13 on: July 09, 2013, 02:36:31 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sorry Yankee I wanted to rewrite the bill first.

Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2013, 09:09:27 AM »

consider it an amendment
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #15 on: July 13, 2013, 08:26:15 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.