Annexing north Mexico 1800s (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 06:51:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Annexing north Mexico 1800s (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Annexing north Mexico 1800s  (Read 7973 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,899


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: September 04, 2012, 01:05:18 AM »

It would have been tricky to annex more than we did -- we got as much land with as few Mexicans as possible.

Back then Monterrey wasn't much of a city, and Baja was pretty damn empty. So, the border could have easily run quite a bit further South. I guess, Tampico and Saltillo would have to stay on Mexican side, but there was still quite a bit of land that didn't have much of a settled population.

Of course, annexing lands around to the South of Texas would have been very hard to digest, but not because of the Mexicans: more because you might have been able to grow cotton there.

Baja California Sur still isn't densely populated, so why not throw that in, too? Mexico didn't even give them statehood until 1974.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.