Abortion, Planned Parenthood v. Casey (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:43:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Abortion, Planned Parenthood v. Casey (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which provisions should have been upheld?
#1
3205: required that a woman seeking an abortion give her informed consent prior to the procedure, and specifies that she be provided with certain information at least 24 hours before the abortion is performed
 
#2
3206: mandated the informed consent of one parent for a minor to obtain an abortion, but provides a judicial bypass procedure
 
#3
3209: commanded that, unless certain exceptions apply, a married woman seeking an abortion must sign a statement indicating that she has notified her husband
 
#4
None of the above
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 17

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Abortion, Planned Parenthood v. Casey  (Read 6373 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: January 13, 2006, 08:34:05 PM »

Let's hope that Stevens finally croaks soon.

Compassionate conservative.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,875


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2006, 08:41:47 PM »

I agree that the compelling interest test with it's undue burdens and all is complete crap. The scary thing is that the 1992 court is just about the most conservative we've had in the past 70 years. If that court couldn't overturn Roe. v Wade than which one will? Assuming that Roberts and Alito turn out OK (a BIG assumption I might add), we're still one vote away from overturning garbage like this.
Substantive due process and the compelling interest standard are here to stay. Even a conservative court is unlikely to overturn either of these doctrines; both Alito and Roberts have explicitly affirmed their support for these concepts.

Roe is certainly in some danger of being overturned, although a sudden frontal assault on that decision is unlikely to succeed any time soon. Alito probably opposes Roe, but I am not at all sure about Roberts.

So Roberts just happens to have a wife who is an anti-abortion activist? Roberts is clearly anti-Roe, but he's not quite as batsh**t crazing as lying Alito.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.