Accomplishments of a Romney first term? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 02:49:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Accomplishments of a Romney first term? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Accomplishments of a Romney first term?  (Read 613 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« on: October 16, 2012, 11:39:46 PM »

Obamacare will still be in place. It will be far too popular to repeal.

No major changes to Social Security or Medicare. Romney and Ryan are just trying to get base support. If they actually try to do anything to these programs, they will certainly suffer political suicide.

Window dressing social conservatism with no real lasting impact and/or teeth.

Massive tax cuts for the rich that will explode the deficit and national debt.

Probably another credit rating downgrade.

Gas prices fall, but only because the economy completely tanks because of cuts to social services.

Double-dip recession, unemployment heads back into double-digits.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi/Steny Hoyer/Chris Van Hollen.

Trade deficit gets even larger as no action is taken against Chinese/German/Japanese currency manipulation and tax cuts for outsourcers continue or are expanded.

Saber-rattling with Iran, Syria, China, Russia, et al.

A Democratic President come 2016.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2012, 06:31:52 AM »

Either way, the economy will flatline within this generation.  You can't have a debt-based economy, and have that economy sustain itself.  Obama's band-aid approaches will help us hold on longer, if Romney somehow manages to gets elected, I see it flatlining around the end of his first term.

Uh, yes you actually can. Capitalism needs debt to actually work and thrive. "You have to spend money to make money" and all that jazz. When government runs at a deficit, people can save; the opposite is also true. If government is continually running surpluses or balanced budgets, the private sector has to pick up the tab for spending that would have normally been done by government, which in turns leads toward recession.

Now I agree that the current debt arrangement is unsustainable, but only because these debts are not held by Americans, for the most part. Japan is hitting upwards of 230% of GDP to debt ratio but it fundamentally doesn't matter, because the debt is held by the  Japanese people, which allows for large scale economic growth. That's why we didn't collapse outright during World War II. We owed ourselves the money, which gave us opportunity to invest in economic growth and development. Today, however, we owe Tokyo and Beijing the money, which only allows us to become less sovereign and further within the grip of these nations.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.