The SC Election Day & Results Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:46:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The SC Election Day & Results Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The SC Election Day & Results Thread  (Read 48437 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: January 21, 2012, 05:22:36 PM »

MSNBC say "record turnout" and "heavier than expected" in the conservative upstate.

And "light to moderate" on the coast.

Thank God for MSNBC's extended coverage today.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2012, 05:40:48 PM »

64% said the debates were an important factor? No, not good for Paul. Obviously excellent for Newt. Should be an amazing night for Newt and confirmation of another Gingrich comeback.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2012, 07:03:33 PM »

Hahahaha excellent. Missed the call. Walked through the party then ran across the street to Five Guys.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2012, 07:15:46 PM »

I'm standing right by where he will walk in. I'm to the left of the podium if you're looking at the stage. Packed house already!
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2012, 07:38:33 PM »

"I'm Jewish. There's no foolin' my ass." - crazy man next to me at the party. Watch for him on the news. This man is wild.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2012, 07:52:26 PM »

"I'm Jewish. There's no foolin' my ass." - crazy man next to me at the party. Watch for him on the news. This man is wild.

Does he have any features that will make him easy to pick out?

Ridiculous cargo hat
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2012, 08:17:05 PM »

The lady next to me and I started the "We want Newt!" chant. The place is crazy.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2012, 08:26:49 PM »

France 24 cameraman right behind mr. So appropriate.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2012, 08:39:23 PM »

"Drop out now" chants at Rick at the party. Sad
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2012, 08:54:07 PM »

"Party like it's 1999?" Really, Team Newt?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2012, 09:14:16 PM »

Newt expected any minute.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2012, 09:35:42 PM »

Newt praising everyone. You can imagine my response when he brought up Santorum. Chants of "VP" were awesome, too! Smiley
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2012, 11:46:08 PM »


Oh, I agree: time for this nation to go for Santorum. I assume you meant to put a comma in there though. Wink
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2012, 12:46:44 AM »

Did Ron Paul really say his campaign has experienced "steady growth" throughout these contests? 21% to 13% is steady growth. Mmmmmhmmmm.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2012, 09:40:21 AM »

Speaking further to the delusion of Paultards, a friend of mine posted on Facebook this morning that the "Christians" (yes, in quotes) helped split the vote in the "bastion of Evangelicaloids" that is South Carolina to allow Paul to take third place last night. Now never mind the fact that the man is clearly in fourth and was clearly in fourth for almost the entire evening...
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2012, 10:36:52 PM »

Did Ron Paul really say his campaign has experienced "steady growth" throughout these contests? 21% to 13% is steady growth. Mmmmmhmmmm.
He doubled his 08 results in Iowa, tripled in New Hampshire, and quadrupled in SC.

Which says what? "I'm more relevant than I was in 2008 and that isn't saying much."


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

And my guy won a state. Yours won't win a single state that is seriously contested.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2012, 12:16:59 AM »


Tied? Uh, no. The vote was not literally tied and the Iowa GOP certified him as the winner. You might want to do a little reading up on the situation.

Amazing how when Romney wins by eight votes, it's a win. Santorum wins by 35? "Yeah, we'll call it a tie."

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So is that going to be your excuse for your guy losing almost all of the contests? "He isn't in sync with the party so cut him so slack for not doing as well!"

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wow! Great! Three contests down and you're ahead by what? Five thousand votes? Wait until Florida passes then I can claim some mandate. Of course, that won't count because Dr. Paul won't be competing. Now whose picking and choosing?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2012, 12:18:35 AM »

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2012/01/rick-santorum-iowa-caucuses-official-winner/1?csp=34news

Bye bye.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2012, 12:51:29 PM »

MBD, a known joke poster, refuses to live up to his guarantee that he'd leave if Santorum won Iowa. A bitter, sore loser child. Nevermind the fact that if Paul won, he'd be slobbering over the MANDATE FOR LIBERTY!!!! And in keep with his joke routine, he blames the media for picking a winner.

Furthermore, MDB, your guy might be the winner in several uncontested states. I've conceded this point already. But this idea that Paul will still have more votes than Santorum after Florida even after you trolls admit that he won't be contesting the state is truly laughable. You're so set on proving me wrong that you can't even keep your Tard Talking Points straight.

Santorum was certified as the winner in Iowa, MDB. Accept it. Get move it. Man up and live up to your pledge instead of being such a child.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2012, 04:57:26 PM »
« Edited: January 23, 2012, 04:59:16 PM by Keystone Phil »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL! The most hilarious moving of the goal posts ever! So this whole time we were all wasting our time on following Iowa because the actual election is at the convention. And your claim on January 3rd about having to leave that night if Santorum won was just a typo? I've heard it all now.



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So the 2000 election was just a tie, right? No winner? WA Gubernatorial 2004? Just a tie, no winner? Who cares if it's statistically a tie? Santorum was declared the winner. I didn't ask for your pledge to leave. You were cocky and made it on your own. Now live up to it.

Keep moving those goal posts, baby. Sore. Loser.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 9 queries.