ehrlich/coleman vs, edwards/richardson 2008 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 01:07:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  ehrlich/coleman vs, edwards/richardson 2008 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ehrlich/coleman vs, edwards/richardson 2008  (Read 11686 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: June 19, 2004, 10:01:47 PM »

yeah Ehrlich/Coleman would win it. I agree with the map except I'd say West Virginia would go for Edwards and I'm not so sure about Maryland. Sure they elected Ehrlich Governor but President is a whole different ball game in MD.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2004, 10:42:09 PM »

Everything went perfect for Coleman? His opponent died. Just like in Missouri's 2000 Senate race, when a candidate dies their poll numbers usually go up and voters back the replacement. It gained nationwide attention and if anything it looked like Minnesota would unite behind whoever the Democrat was. Here's where it went perfect for Coleman though: For some reason the MN Dems picked the guy who barely won his homestate in '84s Presidential race. Yep, they picked Walter Mondale. But heres where it went GREAT for Coleman: That so called "memorial" service where Harkin was shouting like it was a campaign rally and the booing of Republican Senators who went to pay their respects to a late colleague. Well all that backfired ....badly. Now Minnesota is represented by the former conservative Dem turned Republican Norm Coleman. A successful Mayor of St. Paul and a candidate that overcame the odds in a difficult race.

No way did everything go perfect for Norm Coleman. The only things that did go "perfectly" for him were caused by the MN Democrats. Thank you much for helping Norm get to the Senate! Grin
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2004, 11:00:58 PM »
« Edited: June 19, 2004, 11:02:16 PM by Keystone Phil »

You would agree  that the MN Democratic party is the reason why Coleman won though wouldn't you, BRTD? Picking Mondale and allowing Harkin to give a speech were he thought it was a Wellstone campaign rally was their own fault. The media didn't blow it out of proportion. The portrayed it just as it was: distasteful. And when a Senator's colleagues go to pay their respects, do we have to remind them to act their age? Cmon. Now you'll have your chance to beat Coleman in '08 but that election might be a JOKE...recalling that Al Franken might be your candidate. They pick Mondale and Franken would probably win the primary (IF he runs, he's hinting that he won't jump in) in '08 yet they wonder why Coleman wins.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2004, 11:17:20 PM »

You guys still do "favorites" up there in Minnesota? I mean after the '98 Governor's race, I would think that would have ended. Smiley  (I'm guessing you didn't want Jesse for Governor, BRTD)
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2004, 11:19:31 PM »

No one ever said Minnesota would be locked up. It's a tough state but our chances would be better. Bush only lost by what...2 or 3% in 2000. The GOP hadn't come that close in MN since 1984.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2004, 11:28:49 PM »

I agree that Edwards would win some rural swing counties but Ehrlich/Coleman would put up a pretty good challenge.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.