This thread is stupid. He won the state by 17 points. Even if the election had been an even 50-50 election, Obama still wound have won MI comfortably.
The thread is about 2012.
Yes. If a candidate wins a state by 17 points in one election, then he surely at least has "a chance" at winning that state again in the next election and will likely win it again. There's no reason why there would be a 30 point swing in the state.
You were addressing it as if it was about 2008 by using the past tense.
Sure he has a chance but you then go on to say he'd win it comfortably.
How the hell can you say he's likely to win it again so soon? Sure there's a reason why there would be a swing - if the economy is still in the toilet or if it gets even worse. People around here need to stop thinking that politics is governed by trend rules.