True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
Posts: 42,144
|
|
« on: July 11, 2012, 06:01:16 PM » |
|
Let's take a good look at the failures.
1988: 53-46 1992: 37-43-19
The Democratic share went down from 1988 to 1992. Perot's third party played a significant factor is Bush 41's failure to be reelected.
1976: 50-48 1980: 41-50-6
While Reagan won outright in 1980, Carter's margin of victory in 1976 was so small, that any decline was likely going to be fatal, whereas Obama's 53-46 result gives him a cushion that Peanuthead didn't have.
1928: 58-41 1932: 40-57
Having the Great Depression starting on your watch will do that. If the bubble had waited another year to burst, Obama would be a certain one-termer thanks to the Great Recession, but that's not what happened.
1908: 52-43 1912: 23-42-27
As with the 1988-1992 case, we have a third party option upsetting the results and the winner getting less of the vote than his party did four years earlier.
1884: 48.9-48.3 1888: 48.7-47.8 1892: 46.0-43.0-8.5
Altho Cleveland lost round 2, it was because of the quirks of the electoral college. He actually increased his popular vote margin of victory in 1888 over 1884.
1836: 51-49 1840: 47-53
As with Carter fourteen decades lower, Van Buren didn't have much of a margin, so pretty much any bump down was going to defeat him.
Anyway, tbecause Obama has a larger margin to work with that and no significant third party to deal with, if he wins with a lower share of the PV this time, it might be novel, but it won't be noteworthy.
|