Is there acid in my tea? Because when I started reading the second page that's what it felt like. What is the author saying? Is the entire article satirical or has the world gone topsy-turvy?
This piece reads like something out of The Onion. I'm familiar with Politico's reputation for lackluster journalism, but there's definitely something strange about it. I mean...
I'm amused that Ryan "unchained" means Powerpoint presentations based on episodes of School House Rock, but the media overplaying Ryan-as-wonk is nothing new.
The whole "Stench" thing seemed very shocking but not implausible, but the second page was, well, just...
But if that "Stench" thing is true, well... what's the chance Ryan might be replaced?