Let the great boundary rejig commence (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 02:31:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Let the great boundary rejig commence (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Author Topic: Let the great boundary rejig commence  (Read 189077 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #50 on: September 12, 2011, 08:14:01 AM »

*"Doesn't look good for Tim Farron" according to Paul Waugh

What, they haven't drawn Barrow & Kendal or something, have they?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #51 on: September 12, 2011, 08:30:50 AM »

Let's have a very quick competition. In which preserved county (or whatever) will the worst horror be drawn? I might post the winner a stupid postcard or something.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #52 on: September 12, 2011, 08:33:21 AM »

It will be impossible to decide as there will be very many deserving claimants.

Do I win?

If there isn't a clear winner, then, yeah.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #53 on: September 12, 2011, 08:51:16 AM »

Rumours Hazel Blears has lost hers....

There has to be a seat centred around Salford proper, so I don't see how that can be true. Unless things are even more insane than seems likely.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #54 on: September 12, 2011, 11:23:32 AM »

What a bunch of incompetent fyckwits.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #55 on: September 12, 2011, 11:29:55 AM »

I wonder how the many cheerleaders for this idiocy are feeling right now.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #56 on: September 12, 2011, 11:41:40 AM »

For blankness, go to Neighbourhood Statistics (just google it). Then Map Viewer. Then remember how to screenshot.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #57 on: September 12, 2011, 11:45:42 AM »

For blankness, go to Neighbourhood Statistics (just google it). Then Map Viewer. Then remember how to screenshot.

I'll get round to updating 'The Map' at some point.

You should probably include a warning for our eyes or something. Some of these constituencies are quite, quite special.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #58 on: September 12, 2011, 11:52:50 AM »

If it helps that's how 2002 felt to me. To such an extent it made me detached. I only care about the Holyrood arragement and don't particularly care what happens up here next month. You'll probably feel the same with Wales when that monstrosity is unveiled :/

I'm really dreading what they draw for my part of the world, put it that way... can we rule out the horrible possibility of Anglesey being split?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #59 on: September 12, 2011, 12:14:53 PM »

EDIT; I wonder if they did split Anglesey, the boundary would go right down the middle of the bridge.

Which bridge? There are two, and that's the reason why I'm suddenly quite worried... if you decided that the Menai wasn't a particular important geographical barrier in the grand scheme of things, you could split the Island along the general line of the A55, throwing the southern half (including Holyhead) with wherever Caernarfon ends up and the northern half wherever Bangor happens to be drawn.

An alternative is bad as well: a Menai constituency. That is, the Island... and all the wards on the south bank of the Menai.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #60 on: September 12, 2011, 03:17:16 PM »


I prefer open lists, but, yeah. Anything but this.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #61 on: September 12, 2011, 05:45:25 PM »

But is it to be applauded? They've managed to get the numbers to work out right, sure. But this isn't a psephological-wank exercise of the sort that we enjoy a fair bit here, it's the real thing.

Of course given the rules and all that we really shouldn't be terribly surprised by any of this. Even if we all are.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #62 on: September 12, 2011, 06:21:54 PM »

I can understand people not liking Salford much, but it's clear that it ought to form the base of a constituency in its own right.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #63 on: September 13, 2011, 07:42:03 AM »

Looks like they've done things Baxter-style. Though I'd question the validity of any set of notionals to some of these monsters, because the rules of the game change when certain places get put in potentially marginal constituencies.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #64 on: September 13, 2011, 09:50:32 AM »

Remind me never to read the Guardian comment pages on such things ever again.

It's a thing of twisted beauty, is it not? I especially love the bits when people start randomly screaming about immigrants.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #65 on: September 13, 2011, 10:17:31 AM »

It's the CONSPIRACEE brigade that get me. Apparently it was Cameron who chose to count only registered voters rather than it being anything to do with the Representation of the People Act several generations ago. Or it's the 'bankers'; they even seem to get the blame for crap telly.

Oh, by their standards that stuff is pretty tame... it's a little bit embarrassing though. There are enough decent lefty arguments against this whole thing without needed to resort to bizarre and rambling conspiracy theories.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Eventually you read one too many especially idiotic comments threads and, you know. I actually registered because of the idiots who comment on telly threads.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #66 on: September 13, 2011, 03:14:52 PM »

The Mersey thing was apparently drawn as the only way to avoid splitting Chester... why is that worth more than avoiding splitting Ellesmere Port? Huh

Especially as Chester has always been split; part of the city (at least as a functional unit) is in Flintshire.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #67 on: September 13, 2011, 03:29:43 PM »

Oh, yeah. There will be no constituency named for Salford. Which is a city.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #68 on: September 13, 2011, 05:55:07 PM »

Ah, where would cartoonists be without that plum pudding?



(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Caricature_gillray_plumpudding.jpg)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #69 on: September 17, 2011, 07:47:36 AM »


If a man from the state of Georgia can say this, then it must be as terrible as we've all been saying!
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #70 on: September 18, 2011, 06:46:15 AM »

Looking at all the regions now, I think some will be completely changed, not a single proposal will remain

There are some regions where I suspect the changes will be only minimal or not changed at all - I'm going to predict that Eastern England, East Midlands and North East England are falling in this last category.
North East? Seriously? That map is atrocious.

Yeah, Consett & Barnard Castle is one of the very worst constituencies they've drawn and things aren't that much better elsewhere. The seeming conscious effort to keep Beith in his seat is irritating as well.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #71 on: September 18, 2011, 09:56:02 AM »

Swing calculations can't really do that.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #72 on: September 19, 2011, 01:42:22 PM »

The Dumfries seat is excellent, actually. Galloway-Carrick-Cumnock isn't bad either.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #73 on: October 11, 2011, 09:00:54 PM »

The inevitable result of a more politicised procedure is a more politicised procedure.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,951
United Kingdom


« Reply #74 on: October 12, 2011, 09:10:28 AM »

I don't like what the Tories did either, but I don't think it justifies proposing silly gerrymanders.  [NB the only example I've actually seen is "North West Cheshire", which is truly, truly, horrible.  But maybe things elsewhere aren't as bad as is being made out.]

Oh, I'm not trying to justify that kind of thing. It's just that it isn't even slightly surprising and we can expect more of it from everyone when there's a possible 'need' to do so.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 8 queries.