What is wrong with Racial Profiling? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 12:44:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  What is wrong with Racial Profiling? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is wrong with Racial Profiling?  (Read 4630 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« on: July 27, 2005, 08:21:32 AM »

To add to ag's points, note that the one bomber was actually Jamican. He wouldn't have been picked up by racial profiling...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2005, 09:42:34 AM »

One problem Goldie. Islam is a religion... you can't tell if someone is a Muslim just by looking at them.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2005, 10:43:32 AM »

How many Muslims have blonde hair and blue eyes? Of course you can't tell 100% of the time.

How many Christians have blue eyes and blond hair? Not many either.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

True

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

True

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

FALSE

And this is where racial profiling breaks down in this case. Not one of the intial four London bombers were Arabs. Not one of the failed four London bombers were Arabs.
Three of the four originals were Pakistanis, the other (and the one that killed by far the most) was actually Jamiacan. Two of the four failures seem to have been Pakistanis, the other two seem to have come from East Africa.
How the hell does racial profiling help in those cases?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nope. About a third of Muslim men are called Mohammed IIRC, but a lot of those don't use it as there first name as such.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

FALSE
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2005, 10:53:53 AM »

To prove my point these are the suspects in the failed attack (the first photo is the bugger that got tasered by the police this morning)...









And here's the first four bombers:









How exactly would racial profiling have helped to stop their attacks?
Unless you suggest locking up and/or monitoring everyone who doesn't fit your dreams of an Aryan master race...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2005, 05:15:05 PM »

It's funny how some people bring out the one or two cases in which terrorists didn't look we expect terrorists to look, while ignoring the countless other cases in which they have looked exactly as we would expect them to look.

I brought it up because the bomber who "didn't look how we expect them to look" killed as many people as the other three put together
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2005, 02:47:15 PM »

This seems to be why he ran away
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,863
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2005, 07:13:59 AM »

I should add that I'm not opposed to limited racial (or anything else actually) profiling in certain circumstances (ie: in the context of an investigation or during a major terrorist scare etc).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 12 queries.