What is the political geography of the South? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:42:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What is the political geography of the South? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What is the political geography of the South?  (Read 1776 times)
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,391
Russian Federation


« on: November 13, 2018, 06:32:07 AM »
« edited: November 13, 2018, 08:41:53 AM by smoltchanov »

Like most of the country, Democratic strength is concentrated in big cities and majority-minority areas.  The South has a lot of rural, majority-Black areas (MS Delta, Black Belt, etc.) that are very visible on election maps but are generally way less populated than Republican-voting suburban or rural areas.  So while a state like Alabama may have a lot of Atlas-red counties, Democrats consistently struggle to break 40% of the vote.

Republicans dominate with White voters in the South, especially in conservative Evangelical areas.  Like other parts of the country, the recent trend has been for Republicans to do better with working class White voters than college-educated voters.  A lot of Southern Republicans are significantly more moderate on economic issues than social issues, with government support of some welfare and agriculture programs being broadly popular.  

Historically, most of the South was monolithically Democratic with a few notable exceptions (East TN, Texas Hill Country, etc.)  This began to change in the 1940s and 1950s as Southern agriculture mechanized and urban professions in cities and suburbs became more prevalent.  Urban and suburban Whites shifted to the Republican Party before rural White voters in the 1970s and 1980s, while today many of those same areas that first flipped Republican in the 20th century are trending towards Democrats.

This is generally the pattern throughout the South.  



Agree with description. But have a question: wasn't a "migration" of whites to Republican party at least partly caused by growing role of Blacks in Democratic party, and the fact, that there are few Blacks in Republican party? "Comfortable environment", so to say...

P.S. I wrote a big (more then 50 pages in MS Word) paper "Political geography of the US", and published it on a Internet resource.  But - naturally, it's written in Russian, and i don't have a lot of time for full translation of it into English. South takes biggest part of that paper - about 15-20 pages, it's political geography is really rich and varied)))
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,391
Russian Federation


« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2018, 10:05:33 AM »

It's also worth noting that the initial shifts toward the GOP in some Southern states toward the latter parts of the 20th century weren't even necessarily fueled by native Southerners. For example, Georgia's political geography and statewide margins would have probably looked more like North Carolina's from 2000 to present if you negated the carpetbagger growth between 1975-1995 or so.

IIRC - Bush family has roots in Connecticut. And Bush Sr. was one of the "trailblazers" of Texas Republican party. So - this wasn't limited to Georgia. Nevertheless - local conservative Democrats (Gardner and Helms in North Carolina, Thurmond and Watson - in South Carolina, considerable part of "Byrd's machine" in Virginia, and so on) also played an extremely important role too..
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.