SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE: The Judiciary (UNDER NEW MANAGEMENT)

[LastVoter]

I agree that the only thing we all seem to be in agreement on is requiring each justice to write a public opinion. The rest seems to have just run into too much opposition and divergent interests.

This.

[LastVoter]

We might also consider creating some ways where we can create more cases for the court, for example by having Atlasian government file lawsuits in certain cases rather than legislate(I can't think of other ways attm). I don't think there's any reason to increase number of justices until court sees more cases.

[LastVoter]

On recommendation to expand the court by two members
Nay.

On recommendation to require Supreme Court Justices to post opinions on each case considered by the court
Aye

[LastVoter]

i don't know why you're worried about "court packing," since both of the committees working on court reform have pretty much deemed that proposal dead and the chances are that it won't be considered again.

That was precisely my point - you guys failed to pack the court, so don't now in frustration just try to insult us with these demeaning writing assignmetns and micromanagement.

Well they failed to pack the court, but I tried to introduce that to avert the packing of the court.

[LastVoter]

1. Aye
2. Nay
3. Nay

[LastVoter]

1. Abstain
2. Aye

[LastVoter]

Obviously endorsed, I would have thought the Atlasian senate would have gotten around to banning capital punishment already.

[LastVoter]

Aye